> I have been just as pissed off that KW is getting
> photo's ANYWHERE, not just in PF [ I would bet real
> money he IS getting money from the PFA] , and there
> are DOZENS of you out there , who I have spoken with
> recently, who feel the same. HOW ABOUT ANOTHER FORM OF
> ATTACK ? Whether he is getting money for the photo's,
> it is a comercial venture he is operating, do we know
> anyone in the C.A.A. who can look into the legality of
> useing PFA Permit aircraft, and C.A.A. non public
> transport cat' aircraft for aerial work ? I know of
> many ''sorties'' carried out in the Europa
> demonstrators, if he ever recieved ANY money for ANY of
> those photo's, can we ''get the ba**ard'' ? You can
> also be sure, he will be at Kemble this year, and the
> PFA will take his photo's, unless we can get enough
> members to make enough noise ? At the AGM, can someone
> propose that KW's work is vetoed, and get enough
> members there to force that through ? Let's pull
> together on this ? Cheers, Nev.
Hi Nev and the rest of those concerned about KW.
I also had a swift reply from Newby also telling me that
KW isn't paid for the photos. However that is "spin".
[Spin is the art of making a statement which sounds true
but which cannot be proven one way or the other]. There is
no way we can be sure that KW isn't paid.
Another example of spin was when he replied to someone
implying that that respondent was the second person on the
list complaining about it. Unless there is a way to
promulgate who has written in, the powers that be can say
things like that and no-one knows whether it is true or
not. I hope he doesn't repeat the "2 now on the list"
comment to anyone else - because we have got him if he
does as there have been at least four on this list
reporting that they have complained.
I also see KW has the cover of the June PFA magazine also.
Richard Holder
G-OWWW - High Cross #51
|