I've been trying to figure why you have to show the aircraft can reach VNE as
part
of the annual check (i.e. every year). Seems quite a needlessly 'risky' thing
to do. Either it does or ... what?
Regards,
Martin Tuck
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 5, 2017, at 2:40 PM, GTH <gilles.thesee@free.fr> wrote:
>
>
>> Le 05/08/2017 19:36, davidjoyce@doctors.org.uk a crit :
>>
>> As to 3. My 914 mono XS with speed kit did 156 TAS at 2000 ft level and 164
kt TAS at 6,500ft and exceeds VNE at any height over that. Note these are True
air speeds. My smart Blue Mountain EFIS had a TAS read out.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to point out that Vno, Vne etc. have to do with aerodynamic
> efforts
and so are IAS velocities (or more accurately CAS).
>
> David, concerning your speed reports, are those *cruise* numbers (75% power),
or all out performance numbers ? What were your engine & prop settings ? Were
the conditions near standard, or was the weather cold, etc.
> And BTW, what were your IAS's ?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Best regards,
> Gilles
> http://contrails.free.fr
> http://lapierre.skunkworks.free.fr
>
>
>
|