Good advice Nigel=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________
=0A From: "nigel_graham@m-tecque.co.uk" <nigel_graham@m-tecque.co.uk>=0ATo:
europa-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Tuesday, 11 June 2013, 16:42=0ASubject:
Re: Europa-List: Re: Woodcomp or Airmaster Prop=0A =0A=0A=0AHi Jerry,=0A
=0AYou=99ve stimulated an interesting thread and received some high
=0A quality=0A feedback.=0AMy only contribution is to advise
you to look carefully at the Maximum moment of inertia of the combined prop
and VP unit if you are seriously considering fitting a larger diameter Pro
p. =0ARotax advise a maximum of 6000 Kg cm2 (14,328 lb ft2 in old money).
=0AYou might wish to discuss this with Martin before making a final decisio
n.=0A=C2-=0AAtb=0A=C2-Nigel =0A =0AOn 11/06/2013 15:58, N6ZY wrote:=0A
=0ASnip ....... The other question we discussed was the prop diameter. I w
ill fly 98% of the time off hard runways, and cannot see that a 68" diamete
r prop would be impractical even allowing for flat nosewheel tires (tyres?
=========================0A
=======================
|