Jos-
There was an excellent article in Kitplanes about a year ago comparing them all.
They rated one of the Telex sets as best bang for the buck. I tried the set
on at Lakelnad last year and liked if very much. I don't remember the model,
but I'm sure someone at Telex could help. Also, Kitplanes will reprint an
article
for a fee. You may want to e-mail them and see if you can get a reprint.
My magazine is gone.
Jim Puglise
BTW - Got that hinge off with no problem using a solering iron and razor blade.
Thnks !
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "josok" <josok-e@ukolo.fi>
>
> If there is still somebody around and not redoing tail planes or visiting
> Oshkosh:
>
> While i have a pair of very well rated David Clark headsets, my test pilot
> suggested that ANR would be better. I tend to agree, because these passive
> sets
> are probably tuned to reduce the noise of Lycosauruses and the like. So, if
> you
> have experienced the one and the other, what's your opinion? I know already
> which is the most expensive one. They have an offer for CFI's, which they no
> doubt charge back on the end user. Don't have to say that i hate that kind of
> "marketing" Smells of a bribe. So is there a good, less expensive alternative?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jos Okhuijsen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<html><body>
<DIV>Jos-</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>There was an excellent article in Kitplanes about a year ago comparing them
all. They rated one of the Telex sets as best bang for the buck.
I tried the set on at Lakelnad last year and liked if very much. I don't
remember the model, but I'm sure someone at Telex could help. Also,
Kitplanes
will reprint an article for a fee. You may want to e-mail them and
see if you can get a reprint. My magazine is gone.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Jim Puglise</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>BTW - Got that hinge off with no problem using a solering iron and razor
blade.
Thnks ! </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px
solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: "josok"
<josok-e@ukolo.fi>
<BR><BR>> --> Europa-List message posted by: "josok"
<JOSOK-E@UKOLO.FI><BR>> <BR>> If there is still somebody around and not
redoing tail planes or visiting <BR>> Oshkosh: <BR>> <BR>> While i
have a pair of very well rated David Clark headsets, my test pilot <BR>>
suggested
that ANR would be better. I tend to agree, because these passive sets
<BR>> are probably tuned to reduce the noise of Lycosauruses and the like.
So, if you <BR>> have experienced the one and the other, what's your opinion?
I know already <BR>> which is the most expensive one. They have an offer
for CFI's, which they no <BR>> doubt charge back on the end user. Don't have
to say that i hate that kind of <BR>> "marketing" Smells of a bribe. So
is there a good, less expensive alternative? <BR>>
<BR>&
<pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre></body></html>
|