Alan,
Come on now, get real. You are now talking about engineering, there is not
an ounce of blood in that particular stone.
regards,
Mike (It is better to be lucky than good.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Burrows" <alan@kestrel-insurance.com>
Subject: RE: Europa-List: Fw: PFA Magazine Photographs.
> <alan@kestrel-insurance.com>
>
> Well done Mike, you obviously have influence in high places, can you see
> what you can about my authorisation to fit an autopilot please, although
> its only been two months, four letters, three phone calls all without
> even an acknowledgement !
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of MICHAEL
> PARKIN
> To: Europa-List@Matronics.Com
> Subject: Europa-List: Fw: PFA Magazine Photographs.
>
>
> --> <mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com>
>
> This could be considered a result - I think.
>
> regards,
>
> MP
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Graham Newby" <graham.newby@pfa.org.uk>
> To: "MICHAEL PARKIN" <mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com>
> Subject: RE: PFA Magazine Photographs.
>
>
> Mike
> We are listening to the membership and will be sourcing other photos for
> the magazine in the future. The downside is of course that we will
> undoubtably have to pay for shots as good as SFBs. This will probably
> add some 6000 to the annual budget.
>
> best regards
>
> Graham Newby
> Chief Executive
> Popular Flying Association
>
> 01280 846786
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MICHAEL PARKIN [SMTP:mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com]
>> Sent: 27 May 2005 06:57
>> To: Graham Newby
>> Subject: PFA Magazine Photographs.
>>
>> Dear Mr Newby,
>>
>> In unison with many Europa owners, I must also register my objection
>> as a PFA member to the use of photographs by Kieth Wilson in 'POPULAR
>> FLYING'. What Wilson did to a lot of people in the Europa fraternity
>> was totally immoral - he caused the loss of a lot of money from a lot
>> of people. Whether, the photographs are provided free of charge or not
>
>> is irrevelant
>> - the PFA should not use them.
>>
>> This is an Association ( it is rumoured!), why do you not listen to
>> your membership.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> M Parkin
>>
>> Membership No - 026172
>
>
>
|