europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914

Subject: Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
From: PHILLIPS I <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:42:03
Hi Tony


My fuel lines start of low to an Andair fuel valve followed by an Andair 375
Gascolator then to two inline filters followed by both fuel pumps  all this
is inside

The tunnel, then its uphill to the fuel pressure sender just below the
tunnel top,


Then through the tunnel to the Floscan on top of tunnel behind the
instrument panel,


Then up the inside of the firewall to a position directly inline with the
fuel pressure

Regulator, this gives the shortest run with minimal heat sink, then back to
the firewall going through just slightly to the strb side of the fuel feed
and both covered

In fire sleeve,


 Behind the firewall is my second Floscan wired to the Matronics box of

 tricks,
 I used soft aluminium pipe from the transducer around the firewall and
under the door to terminate into the aluminium vent fuel tank fitting, with
aluminium pipe its easy to make  gentle bends to reduce turbulence and
improve fuel flow,


 It sounds complicated but it users the shortest runs with the Gascolator at
the lowest point in the system with the majority of fitting protected inside
the tunnel from engine heat or outside cold,  The fuel
pumps/Filters/Gascolator are easily serviceable with a drop down door to the
tunnel,


Regards

Ivor

G-IVER


On 30 April 2011 02:35, Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
> I am attempting to determine where my fuel lines will go within my tunnel,
> through my Singleton Firewall, and then up to my 914, then what path is best
> for my fuel return line to take to route fuel back to the tank, without
> going downhill, and then back up again. This is hard without having the 914
> out of its box, which is why I'd like advice for where in the firewall I
> should cut holes for my fuel hose. I am building a Bob Berube Conventional
> undercarriage, so I don't have bungee cord to consider. I also see merit in
> having the fuel lines supported within the tunnel, albeit I have 2 bulkheads
> to transit, the first is an internal stiffener and dividing panel about 6"
> back from the firewall, and another stiffening bulkhead an inch or so
> forward of the throttle, that links internally within the tunnel the front
> vertical face of the thigh supports, where my maingear is mounted
> underneath. This is to create a box section stiffener. So, how high up can I
> run my fuel lines in the !
>  tunnel to exit Grahams firewall, and then have enough room for no radical
> bends up to engine inlet positions?
> Thanks.......also:
> I am aware of Matt Draille's Fuel Flow Controller advertised on his home
> page, and historically I recall others being available. I have only 1
> Floscan 201B, and they aint cheap, plus I don't have the said device yet
> either. If Matts is the best, well problem solved, but I am wondering if
> there is a workaround, such as an EFIS that will do this. How have others
> with a 914 solved this problem??
> Thanks
> Reg
> Tony Renshaw
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>