Will. I just remember the awful vibration that the BMW twin caused. Also th
e =0Adevelopment time will be extensive=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A____________
____________________=0AFrom: William Daniell <wdaniell@etb.net.co>=0ATo: "e
uropa-list@matronics.com" <europa-list@matronics.com>=0ASent: Tuesday, 5 Oc
tober, 2010 1:34:25=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: the eternal engine debate
t.co>=0A=0AWell for me at 8500 ft it makes more power than a 912s and is ha
lf the price of =0Aa 914.....=0A------Original Message------=0AFrom: Jeff B
=0ASender: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com=0ATo: europa-list@matroni
cs.com=0AReplyTo: europa-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: the
eternal engine debate=0ASent: Oct 4, 2010 17:05=0A=0A--> Europa-List messa
ge posted by: Jeff B <topglock@cox.net>=0A=0AWill,=0A=0AOther than price, I
don't understand the attraction. 80hp with turbo=0Aand ? if the turbo sho
uld fail. 500hrs TBO? That's 4 engines for the=0ATBO on a 912ULS. Hmmmmm
m.=0A=0AJeff Baby Blue=0A=0AOn 10/4/2010 4:23 PM, William Daniell wrote:=0A
=0A>=0A> Does anyone thing this is viable?=0A>=0A> http://www.apsu-hks.com/
HKS_APSU_-_HKS_700T.html=0A> or=0A> http://www.greenskyadventures.com/Engin
ePricing/HKS/700T-vs-912Rotax.html=0A>=0A> it is only 80hp BUT it is turbo
and claims excellent fuel consumption.=0A> Maybe at USD16,500 maybe it is w
orth consideration.=0A>=0A> Will=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> Checked by AVG
===
|