Rob; when you said it would interfere with the constant speed prop is it safe
to presume you meant it would interefere with a hydraulic prop and not an
electric
constant speed prop like the Air Master which I ordered? Thanks
Paul
Rob Housman <RobH@hyperion-ef.com> wrote: Subscribe to the AeroElectric-List
at http://www.matronics.com/subscription
and browse (or search) for a recent thread on "electric gyros" and you will
soon be convinced that it is beneficial to get rid of the unreliable vacuum
pump in favor of a second alternator for your all-electric panel. If you
plan to fly in the clouds this should be a no-brainer decision, but the
other trade-off is the constant speed prop you'll not have.
Browse the list some more and you will realize that 18 A is probably
adequate, but redundancy requires the second alternator anyway.
Best regards,
Rob Housman
A070
-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of Paul Boulet
Subject: 18 amps from a 914 !!!
Hi All;
I'm sorry to say that I've buried my head in the sand regarding the
relatively small amp output from the Rotax 914 I'm considering. It seems
unbelievable to me that a $15,000 turbo charged engine would have such low
amperage output...I mean geez.... the landing lights, strobe and
nav/position lights alone eat up 15 amps.
Is it true that the only option is to add a second alternator (in lieu of
vacuum so goodbye vacuum instruments)?
I'm planning my panel and seems that space in the 3/4 length panel isn't the
only limiting factor. Comments would sure be appreciated. Thanks
Paul Boulet, A212
---------------------------------
The Europa Forum is supported by Aviators Network UK
In the event of problems contact
The Europa Forum is supported by Aviators Network UK
In the event of problems contact
---------------------------------
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
|