europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Balun

Subject: Re: Balun
From: Robert L. Nuckolls III <nuckolls@aeroelectric.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:24:38
Is there an expert out there who can explain how the Balun works!  

There is no physical electical connection  of the center wire 
of the coax as explained in the Kitfox assembly manual and it 
just does not look like it should work!  The shield is split and 
the VOR cat's whiskers  are connected to each of the split ends of 
the shielded wire. 

   There are three or four commonly used "balun" (short for balanced
   to unbalanced) fabrication techniques using coaxial cable. You can
   also do the job with little ferrite core transformers . . in fact
   an antenna company in MO used to offer some antennas to amateur
   airplane builders that used small transformers inside a molded
   plastic center insulator on their products.

   It's not easy to explain. Some excellent info on transmission line
   theory and grass-roots practice can be gleaned from American Radio
   Relay League's publications on antennas and feedlines for radio
   amateurs.

I understand the purpose of the balun is to balance the impedance of the 
feedline to that of the antenna.

   Correct . . .

Is there another way to feed a VOR antenna?

   Sure . . . hook the shield to one whisker and the center conductor
   to the other whisker.  Putting a balun in the system is a mixed bag.
   It adds complexity . . . more solder joints . . . should be checked
   with an antenna analyzer to see if everything is cut to proper
   length . . . bottom line is that you'll not be able to percieve
   any difference in performance by simply judging how well your VOR
   receiver works.  Other airframe effects such as electrical system noise,
   p-static and atmospherics can have worse effects on VOR reciver performance
   than the fact that you failed to "properly" terminate your coax cable
   by hooking it to a balanced antenna.

   There's a popular kit offered where ferrite beads or toroids are
   slipped over the coax in immediate vicinity of the feedline attachment
   to the antenna. I illlustrate this in my book's chapter on antennas
   and feedlines.  I've since learned (and seen demonstrated in the
   lab) that a few toroids are not enough to make a difference. It takes
   several dozen to equal the effects of a properly implemented balun.

   VHF is line of sight stuff. If you can "see" the station you can
   hear it or talk to it and a wet string would probably suffice for
   an antenna. The ol' vacuum tube radios of yesteryear needed EVERY
   advantage we could give them . . . modern solid state receiver
   technology will work with very marginal signals compared to 40
   years ago.

   Make it easy on yourself. Hook 'er up, make sure you do a good job
   with the connections and protect them from stresses of vibration
   and environment and call it quits . . . it'll work just fine.


     Bob . . .
     --------------------------------------------
     ( Knowing about a thing is different than  )
     ( understanding it. One can know a lot     )
     ( and still understand nothing.            )
     (                     C.F. Kettering       )
     --------------------------------------------
           http://www.aeroelectric.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Balun, Robert L . Nuckolls III <=